SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (227369)4/17/2007 11:49:17 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Which values do you think they should ignore with regards to law?

What clothes people can legally wear, who can socialize with whom, when and what individuals can eat, what sex you need to be to drive, and most things that are basically ridiculous in modern life, and opposed by all but the most fanatical Muslims population as well as all the non-Muslim population. Iranians can't dance in public places, for example. I think even most Iranian Muslims agree that that law is completely ridiculous. If one thinks a good Muslim shouldn't dance in public, he shouldn't, but if other Muslims think its OK, then let them dance.

"So why legally prohibit non-Muslims from eating in public during Ramadan?"

I don't think that is a major issue, do you? I don't see it as a 'value' in any event.


It's not a major issue at all, but it is what I mean by legislating their religion. If good Muslims don't eat in public during Ramadan, fine, they don't have to. On the other hand to forbid eating for everyone is legislating religious behaviour, and that's the area where I'm saying Muslims are way behind the other major religions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext