"Moreover, you also erred by saying the reporter, in his report, either repeated Davis's words or paraphrased them. I reminded you of that but, as it , unremarkably turned out, you did not acknowledge that at all."
There were quotation marks around a false quote in the article you posted. What, exactly, are you talking about? I'm not sure what you are trying to get across, and so rather than assume, why don't you clarify what you mean.
I assumed you would like Fox based on your posting habits- I wasn't "telling you" what they were; I was telling you what my assumption was. There is a rather large difference between those two things. I am pleased and happy to be wrong about that. I do not mind being wrong, and if that assumption made you feel uncomfortable, if you found it rude, or insulting, you have my apologies for that, as well. |
