SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (333974)4/18/2007 6:36:41 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1573887
 
Re: "That's because VA's gun control laws are so lame."

Why quote part of my statement if your just going to ignore it?

"...he would have gotten a gun no matter what gun laws VA put in place"

Its to bad all the students and faculty where unarmed so he could shoot almost 3 dozen people over the course of two and a half hours.

So are you suggesting that everyone should carry a gun in this country?


No. I'm merely stating that restrictions on guns help to make incidents like this more severe, and that it would have been fortunate if one or more of the victims or intended victims where armed and could have stopped the killer.

You want to pick an incident to use to argue for gun control? Try impulse shootings or accidental shootings. A planned, relatively lengthy massacre like this, that happened in an area where guns are against the rules doesn't support your case, it is rather a very good argument against restrictions on guns. People need to be able to defend themselves against the likes of Cho Seung-Hui. The cops didn't do the job, and probably couldn't do it, at least not before he killed 32 people.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext