SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Case for Nuclear Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (156)4/19/2007 10:45:08 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 312
 
Going straight hydrogen would almost certainly be more efficient, and less polluting. OTOH if your pulling in CO2 from the air to make the hydrocarbons then the artificial hydrocarbons would be just as "carbon neutral" as straight hydrogen, and there are logistical advantages to having gasoline rather than hydrogen which is more difficult to store and transport, and would need a redesign of existing cars.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News