Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 172.29

-2.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: lml who wrote (62881)	4/20/2007 5:58:20 AM
From: BDAZZ	Read Replies (1) of 196981

>>NOK has chosen a 3rd scenario, one that may not have been specifically contemplated at the time of negotiation: non-renewal of the contract/cont'd use of Q's IP/ non-payment of royalties to Q. However, in contract law, in particular, the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) which deals with tangible goods, where the contract is silent, terms may be inferred based upon the parties "course of performance" following execution of the contract, as well as "course of dealing" prior to entering into the contract.<< Isn't there also an understanding of "good faith" in contracts, in that one party does not attempt to turn sleeze and use the terms of a contract to steal the property of the other. Wouldn't this also void the respective terms?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next