The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (21050)	4/24/2007 8:21:43 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (1) of 46821

Hi Frank, >>How are such of future 100M and Gb wireless links being supported by their proponents if spectrum doesn't exist to support them, as I believe you are suggesting?<< To get 1 Gbps throughput at 64QAM (6 Bps/Hz) takes > 125 MHz, and using omnis require > 24 dB Carrier to Interferer Ratio, so smart antennas are indicated. The 'G' in 4G stands for Government, and spectrum is refarmed (present users are required to relocate elsewhere) by Government edict. Thus, military users receive part of auction proceeds to pay for their spectrum relocation. WRC 2007 is mainly about regional/global agreement to relocate incumbents so that cellular can be deployed in their bands. IMT Advanced would not exist without 'spectrum refarming': e.g. www.asiasat.com/eng/05_technical/Satellite%20Spectrum.pdf www.fcc.gov/wrc-07/iwg/iwg3/docs/iwg3_pr1.4_viewb_698mhz.pdf (note how little spectrum the author's companies hold) petere

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next