Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DMaA who wrote (204347)	4/27/2007 10:06:58 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) of 793999

There's still time to correct your post. No correction needed. You ignored the "except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required," which would, of course, be for "cleaning the[ir] behind." The overwhelming proportion of her trips to the rest room would not be for "cleaning her behind" but rather for catching that last drip, an function that could be accomplished easily with one square (even if that square were only one ply <g>). For that "pesky" once-a-day activity, she allows two or three. It's not valid to insist that she proposes folks "clean their behind[s]" with one square. Surely "two or three" squares is practically as good a basis for ridicule.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next