SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Rose who wrote (96842)4/27/2007 11:41:43 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) of 173976
 
Wrong. Saddam's Mustard Gass shells from 1982 were useless and worthless to anyone. Theoretically, they could kill someome if deployed correctly, but no terrorist group would have even wanted them, even if Saddam had actually had any kind of alliance with Al Qaida, which he never did.

In actuality, a Timothy McVeigh type fertilizer bomb would be far more useful to a terrorist group than Saddam's old depleted shells from the Iran-Iraq war. They definitely do not qualify as serious WMD. If they had, Bush-Cheney would have mentioned them. They never did. They only mentioned the stuff Saddam didn't have, like VX, Anthrax and nukes. All to try and scare us into supporting their disasterous invasion without a plan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News