Nokia Corp. (NOK) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia Corp. (NOK)

NOK 6.550

-0.9%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (4882)	4/30/2007 9:11:21 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 9255

I don't know if this is a typo, wishfull thinking or what but Motorola is excluded and 28% is unaccounted for. I don't ever recalled seeing anything out of Qualcomm that supports such numbers. It looks like it might be some form of "essential patent" response to the Goodman and Carr report. Whatever the approach it sure is weird to see Nokia quoted as having 3%. These numbers are actually from the Q sponsered paper which counted the number of patent citations for the essential patents to determine the relative value of the patent portfolios. Page 18..... qualcomm.com Two broad points about this method.... - The Nokia number really is stunningly low. How in the world does IDCC have more citations to their patents than Nokia? Regardless of what you think of this method (and personally, I see it as substantially more valid than counting patents), the Nokia number is an eye opener. - I wonder what Q's citation count would look like if they excluded the patents for which Nokia has a "paid up" license. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next