RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jimtracker1 who wrote (13185)	5/4/2007 11:47:33 AM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (1) of 14464

Well JT, my answers would be: 1(a) They don't want you to read it; or 1(b) They don't want you to understand it; or 1(c) They don't care whether you read or understand it but want to make damn sure it will be tough for you to sue them for not telling you exactly how badly you are being screwed; and 2(a) They can sell it by paying off the secured debt; or 2(b) They can sell it by obtaining the consent of the secured creditors w/o paying off the secured debt; or 2(c) They can sell it and defend the foreclosure action brought by the secured creditors. Of course if I have to limit myself to one answer for each question I guess I'll go with 1(c) and 2(a). My only question is why bother talking to the BoD when you can vote them out and be done with it? I intend to vote no over 38000 times on all of them... external and internal... until they get the message. Frankly any shareholder who'd do otherwise has to be looking for profit on something other than earnings/equity growth. But heck, if folks want to ream them out while voting no... it won't ruffle my feathers. 0\|0

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next