SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 681.86-0.7%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim S who wrote (4297)5/5/2007 8:24:40 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 25737
 
"There's a difference between a physical law and a theory. Physical laws can't be broken....'

I believe you are incorrect.

A 'law' of science (same as a theory) is ONLY a 'law' until it is disproven or changed & replaced.

Happens all the time.

It used to be that the 'law' held that the nucleus of an atom was the smallest discrete unit of matter --- now that belief has been tossed on the rubbish heap of outmoded concepts.

The difference between a 'law' of science, and a 'theory' of science, and even a 'hypothesis' of science... is a matter of DEGREES of proof, (not of 'kind').
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext