HI Tomato and everyone: SI is a collection of personalties unlike
anywhere on the internet. I have relished all opinions whether good
or bad or indifferent. Where one posts whether on #1 or #2 makes no
difference to me. Everyone views SI with a different purpose and may
express those thoughts in several ways which is their god-given right.
I personally like the added flavors of songs and jokes and humor sprinkled in with some lively exchange of views. This has been a long
summer for Winspear Shareholders. Many times I have started to post and have scratched them because I felt they werent productive. To
pass the months and weeks when the news has been slow., with humor.,
and the like has been beneficial to all reading the thread.
It would have been nice to have had the share price respond in the manner all was hoping for. I didnt and that is reality. But you know.,
the fat lady hasnt even struck a note., I still firmly believe in the
geology., and time will prove it. I remember a post from several
months back. An individual attended the Toronto Mining Show and talked with Eira Thomas on what she felt Winspears chances of a significant discovery. She as I recall told him when the land based
targets on the penninsula were drilled and if the source was not found
the next move would be onto the lake. Up to this point., the counts
are of economic significance. As always the tonnage is and has been
the problem. There is a whole spectrum of events concerning grade.,
gem quality., value/carat//., carats/ton which are all interelated
when determining a net asset value in the ground. Small deposits if
exceedingly high grade, high percentage gem quality can be as valuable
in the ground as low grade high tonnage., low dollars per ton discoveries. One high grade deposit 100meters by 100Meters with a mineable depth of 400meters will change everyones perception.
Betwix and between both threads., George |
