SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (15070)5/8/2007 12:32:11 PM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (1) of 22250
 
Elroy > its not a reason to accept the official story, but it is a reason to doubt a conspiracy

You are putting the cart before the horse. I doubted the official story and considered a conspiracy because the official story was suspect. The buildings couldn't have disappeared/turned to dust/collapsed in the manner suggested because it's simply not possible. Steel buildings don't collapse from fire alone and certainly not in an hour.

Unlike you, I don't believe one considers how many people were involved and if the number is small then that makes a conspiracy more likely. The reason is one doesn't know who was involved. For example, people working for the US, or any other, secret service are sworn to secrecy. Hundreds could have been involved and one would never know. Those not in the secret service could have been threatened with death if they said a word. Those involved in carrying out 9/11 would certainly not have been people "off the street".

> Lets talk people/planners/plotters/bombers.

IMO, to call off NORAD and cover-up the evidence, some high-level Americans had to have been involved but the demolition job on the WTC could have been done by foreigners eg Israelis or British, for example.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext