Difficult to disprove? Who's kidding who here?
Religions that utilize the Bible do not contain "a set of beliefs at variance with a large body of modern knowledge?" Again, who's kidding who?
Sorry, I would not give Holocaust deniers the time of day. Also, that is off-topic. We were discussing Mormonism.
Our adventures in the ME would not have happened but for the support of certain Christian views.
That is a refreshing change of pace from the usual reason advanced these days: Jews disguised as neo-conservatives. Personally, I think you need to reach deeper than that, probably to Greek or Roman mythology, but that really is another argument entirely, and a rather boring one at that, I think.
Look, I'm not interested in defending Mormon theology, I certainly do not subscribe to it, but I don't think it is any more difficult to remain a practicing Mormon in the modern world than it is to remain a practicing Roman Catholic. What you do or don't believe is your business. Who you will or won't vote for because of what they believe is your business. Me? I won't be voting for Mitt Romney any time soon, but it has nothing to do with whether or not he is a Mormon. YMMV - in fact, I am positive it does.
|
