SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.

SLJB 0.000001000

-90.0%

Jun 4 9:43 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MrGoodBuddy who wrote (1489)	5/11/2007 8:00:56 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) of 1681

Why Markle would file a Pro Hac Vice motion using the name of a FL attorney, and which was not signed by the FL attorney, is puzzling. Did he really expect the Drago attorneys not to notice anything was amiss, especially after he wrote to them on 26 Apr 07 saying he had withdrawn his services because his clients 'wouldn't talk to him"? On April 26, 2007, Markle wrote to us stating that he was withdrawing as counsel for defendants. See Ex. A hereto. We told Markle that he should seek formal withdrawal. See Ex. B. Nevertheless, Markle stated he was not representing the defendants and would be notifying the Court. See Ex. C. Markle concluded: “Good luck in your endeavors.” Markle never notified the Court of his withdrawal and omits any mention of it in his pro hac vice motion. Mr. Markle has shown little reason to believe he will adhere to this District’s rules. He allowed defendants to default in responding to the complaint. We will be moving for a default judgment shortly. Markle is also operating alone. He appears to be merely using the name and office of another lawyer in this District without written permission. We advised Attorney Lerner on May 4, 2007 by phone that Markle filed the motion without Mr. Lerner’s signature. Mr. Lerner has advised us that he had not been retained to represent the defendants in this action. Maybe he's just lonely in that solo law practice in Texas. By: carmelbeach 11 May 2007, 07:30 PM EDT Msg. 13195 of 13195 (This msg. is a reply to 13191 by carmelbeach.) Jump to msg. # RICHARD W. MARKLE Bar Card Number: 12989100 Work Address PO BOX 541182 HOUSTON, TX, 77254-1182 Work Phone Number (713) 520-0492 Primary Practice Location HOUSTON , Texas Current Member Status Eligible To Practice In Texas License Information State Bar Card Number: 12989100 Texas Licensed*: 05/11/1984 Practice Information Firm: No information reported by attorney Firm Size: Solo Occupation: Private Law Practice Primary Practice Areas: No information reported by attorney Services Provided: No information reported by attorney Assistance available in languages: No information reported by attorney Courts of Admittance: Federal Courts of Admittance: No Federal Courts reported by attorney Other Courts of Admittance: No information reported by attorney Other States Where authorized to practice: No Other States reported by attorney Education and Certification History Law Schools: Law School Graduation Date Degree Earned South Texas College Of Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization Certifications: No profile data on file for Texas Board of Legal Specialization Certification ragingbull.quote.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next