GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Land Shark who wrote (98046)	5/14/2007 4:51:07 PM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (4) of 173976

Ok. Where is the "hard proof" of how these 57,000 people would have voted? I know you back profiling because this article prominently mentions that most were black or hispanic. So are you further guilty of racism by saying they would have all voted for Gore? I would appreciate seeing the signed affidavits of all 57,700 that prove they are eligible to vote and that they would have voted for Gore. Until such a time, it is people prattling on and continuing a 6 yr temper tantrum about losing. It is also foreigners who have no business in our business running their mouths. That part would apply to you. How did they arrive at 90.2 being innocent? Who researched 57,700 people? Where are the records that exonerate the 90.2%? Or did they sample 15, found 14 innocent and extrapolated? You know like the polls where they ask 100 people & then say it applies to the entire US. This is an article from the nation, not hard proof. If you get me the Harvard studies and raw data, that wouldbe hard proof. Until such a time, you willnot get me to believe that a non-partisan review of the election was done with any credibility.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next