Thank Victor Niederhoffer, of Daily Speculations for drawing my attention to this link;
analyze.us.cision.com
The company has a news positive / news negative weighing system for capturing a Balanced View of a companies current psychological summation.
While it rates the reputations of the 100 largest companies, which isnt important to our SIP method and practice, it sheds light on additional methods which can be used to characterize, issues surrounding companies & markets as systems where companies are rubiks cubes..to be figured out.
In a market that is a system of sytems, CEO Forensics has always been another key side of our Rubiks News approach to any particular company.
All publishing, from whatever medium; is Output, and to what degree you can identify the particular output and properly characterize its lineage and intent, the better off you are.
I've profiled many hundreds of message board threads, thousands of people, and over time have developed a pretty capable methodology for performing the forensic tests necessary to find the source of any output.
This might seem meaningless to some, but its not too me, once the systems engages the public through mediums as output, said output can be matched to known behavior profiles previously assembled. Patterns emerge and very clearly, so do the progressions and sequences which follow.
Medium Forensics is an emerging field all market systemologists must embrace, otherwise the usefulness of RO/RS = CF can never be fully known;
Thinking about markets and investing in this day and age; requires knowledge of the mechanistic practices and uses of propaganda as bought and paid for output.
Ends seem to justify the means, imagine that. |
