The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: neolib who wrote (12746)	5/20/2007 8:52:35 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 36917

Not a sign of alarm from you that Mann had to be forced to release the info. He fought it for years. In spite of the forced release, I had read that it was only partial. That's why I brought it up. You posted an early part of the Wikipedia entry that cited Mann's supporters. If the Wiki is right, then the refutation that you didn't post takes care of Mann. Overall, the committee believes that Mann's assessments that the decade of the 1990s was the hottest decade of the millennium and that 1998 was the hottest year of the millennium cannot be supported by his analysis. en.wikipedia.org; I know why you don't like REASON. Just doesn't fit with your beliefs. -- Mann published a retraction in the June 2004 issue of Geophysical Research, in which he admits underestimating the temperature variations indicated by the proxy data by more than one-third since 1400, which accounts for why he missed the Little Ice Age. Strangely, Mann still argues this considerable error doesn't impact his conclusions. reason.com; But none of this makes any difference to you religious Greens.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next