SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (12793)5/21/2007 1:02:13 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 
The problem is that we are dealing in a political argument, not a scientific one.

Jeez, you have been posting crap science half the day on this, now you claim the problem is not science but political. You don't understand any of the science as you have brilliantly shown today, or have you forgotten already that the article you linked was almost pure BS as I pointed out? Why should I consider the above stupid statement to have relevance?

I'll ask you once again: Show any graph which contradicts Mann. All that exists are people bitching about the reconstructed historical data, and sure, all the graphs differ back in those regions, but Mann lies about smack in the middle of the pack. So big freaking deal.

Lets get this straight: Mann was pointing out the blade on the stick, not the handle. All you are arguing about is that the handle should be more crooked. Fine, let it be. What good does that do you? It does not in any way change the portion of Mann's graph for which we have measured data which you can't argue with. Get a clue. The models are able to match that. That is what your BS fails at.

have watched this go on for 30 years.

LOL! If you had been awake you might have learned something. It was about 30 years ago that the early global warming predictions were made that the temps would break above the background noise sometime around the year 2000, which turned out to be correct. Did you miss that?

Too bad we won't be around 30 years from now to see how this works out.

I shouldn't have any problem making that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News