SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (231851)5/22/2007 2:00:18 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Well then today it sure seems that since Lebanon doesn't want them that they should be relocated to the West Bank, wouldn't you say? They are the product of the Israel-Pal conflict, not a Lebanese conflict.

They are the product of the Israeli-Arab conflict of 1948, which involved Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Transjordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. And Israel and the local Arabs, of course.

During the course of 1947 - 1951 over a million people moved/ became refugees - about 600,000 - 700,000 Arabs of Palestine (the term "Palestinian" at the time referred to the Zionists) and about 700,000 - 800,000 Jews of the Arab lands. The Brits tried to negotiate a transfer of populations, which had been done in the same period on a much larger scale in India and Pakistan.

But the Arabs wouldn't recgonize Israel. So they just turfed their own Jews out, and refused to take the Palestinian refugees. Instead they got the UN to invent a special new division for them, UNWRA, whose mission was not to resettle them, but to feed and house them forever. The other refugee populations of the world are seen to by the UN High Commission on Refugees, whose mission is to repatriate or resettle, so they don't get the same treatment.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext