SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Final Frontier - Online Remote Trading

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: TFF5/25/2007 6:58:33 PM
   of 12617
 
Banks turn to credit derivatives as trading tools

By Gillian Tett
Thu May 24, 5:20 PM ET


Global banks have started to use credit derivatives to expand their level of risk-taking - rather than to hedge their own credit risks, according to new analysis.


In particular, large global banks, as a sector, are now writing growing numbers of contracts that sell credit risk protection to other counterparties - instead of buying protection for their own lending risks, internal analysis from Fitch rating agency suggests.

The analysis challenges the widely held assumption that the expansion of the credit derivatives sector has helped banks, as a whole, to shed risk from their own books. Consequently, the pattern may provoke a new debate about the wider impact of the way that risk is being transferred between different players in the financial system, as innovation gathers pace.

The Fitch analysis of banks' net positions with credit derivatives was partly drawn up by its financial industry team, using bank data and other sources.

It suggests that during the period from 2002 to 2005, banks, as a sector, were using credit derivatives to reduce their exposure to risk by "buying" more protection from other counterparties, via credit default swap contracts, than they were "selling".

These contracts typically work by one counterparty agreeing to "sell" protection to another - meaning that the "protected" party pays a fee each year in exchange for a guarantee that if a bond goes into default, the seller of protection will provide compensation.

However, last year the banking sector as a whole became a net "seller" of credit protection, according to Fitch calculations - meaning that banks wrote more contracts to sell protection to other counterparties than they bought.

The other parties who have been selling exposure on a large scale are believed to be insurance companies and specialist credit derivative product companies. Those buying protection are believed to include hedge funds and pension groups.

A key reason for this switch, Fitch believes, is that banks are now placing more importance on CDS as trading tools, not hedging instruments: whereas 30 per cent of banks it recently surveyed suggested that hedging was a "dominant" motive for using CDS, 43 per cent used it for intermediary purposes, and 51 per cent used it for trading. This pattern has helped to drive a dramatic expansion in trading volumes in the CDS world in the last year.

However it has also dramatically boosted overall use of CDS: the total size of the sector has grown from less than $1,000bn at the start of the decade, to more than $33,000bn at the end of last year, with most of the expansion having occurred in the last three years.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext