Do you keep switching your list of leaders, Dabum3?
Did you not say this was your list of leaders in your post of 4/12?
"Plenty of leaders too!
GSF, PBR, NE, ATW, DVN, SWN, COG, NBL and RRC are just a few."
"I bet on the leaders."
Was that post not in response to quehobo's list of laggards? Were you not suggesting THAT list as a better performing list going forward than the laggard list?
I don't know where this second,other list you are mentioning now comes from. I searched this thread for "WHQ" which is on this other second list. "WHQ" is only mentioned here once (by you now in your post)since Jan 1, 2006.
I'm only responding to the list I see. Your 4/12 list was the list you posted.
Looking again at this second, new list now, I also don't find ATLS mentioned here (this thread) before, and it seems like you last mentioned it on your own thread 5/29/06. You don't give your buy dates on your list. Or do you post on ATLS for for a year? I am missing the point. Are you saying this stock was a leader at the buy price mentioned, it should have been bought, you bought it at that price, and you gained the 24.2%? And/or are you saying that the stock, being on THIS leader list, and not the 4/12 list (a list which should not be considered now?), is one of the stocks that, going forward, ought to beat stocks that are on the laggard list?
I'm getting sucked in here...spending more time on this than is worth it for me. I conclude you're too slippery for me. You will never let yourself to be pinned to the mat.
If you're making great gains from buying leaders however you define leaders on one or many lists, then good for you. And if you're convinced your leaders beat anybody else's laggards, and that works for you, then okay too.
For me, I can't see it, follow it, confirm it. |
