Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ali Chen who wrote (23991)	10/4/1997 9:57:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	of 1576613

Ali - Re: "..others have completely dismanteled my position about useless i440LX" Just to remind you of your wrong assessment of the 440LX - independent benchmarks - REAL BENCHMARKS - verify the imoproved memory access times with the 440LX vs the 440FX chip set when used with the Pentium II. The net result is that the 440LX is a big omprovement - verified by these folks whose URL you uncovered for us all (ps. - Thanks!) Paul Original Benchmarks: tdl.com {============================================================} Ali - Re: "LX test results (P-II, 128MB SDRAM, etc., etc): +-1.5% compared to 440FX !!!!!!" The folks who did the testing ran many benchmarks - you did them and yourself a disservice to report only one. Here are two additional ones that you "failed" to report: {===================} We also used Stream under Linux to test memory I/O. The 440LX averaged 174.0MB/S while the 440FX measured 98.3MB/S. That's a 77% improvement in the newer technology. Running Java Stream Under NT to measure memory performance indicated that the 440LX is 25.4% faster than the 440FX. {===================}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next