SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: longnshort who wrote (13086)5/29/2007 10:41:49 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
well slavery is different slaves were just property. Sanger want free PEOPLE to die not property.

Sounds like you are saying it was fine to do bad things to slaves since they were property, not free people?? Is this really what you think?

If so, Sanger should just have argued that certain classes first be made slaves, then dealt with at ones pleasure since they would now be property?

and every race were slaves at the time of the fathers. Arabs and American indians enslaved the white man


Ah, so since slavery was near universal, therefore we cannot fault the founding fathers. But when eugenics was in fashion, the same argument would not apply?

Try a dose of consistency would you?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News