SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : NTEG- Bloodless Glucose Monitor

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: William T. Katz who wrote (39)10/5/1997 12:34:00 AM
From: Jim Lovejoy   of 176
 
Well, since Brad hasn't asnwered, here's an answer re accuracy
from the parent of a diabetic.

Our son is trying to keep his blood sugars between 80 and 150
(g/deciliter, divide by 18 for Canadian/European MM/L).
A difference of 50 in blood sugar will mean a difference of 1
unit of insulin. For a "normal" range of 80 to 150 then, 85%
accuracy will mean a difference in reading of 12 to 22 1/2.

Notice that that will not even mean a difference of 1 unit in
insulin used. Down below 80, the important thing is that a
"low" blood sugar will give a low reading. A blood sugar of
50 for example would give a reading of 42.5 to 57.5 at 85% accuracy,
good enough, they both give the same signal, "low, take sugar".

At the high end, the readings can make a difference in treatment,
a reading of say 340 when the actual blood sugar is 400 would
mean 3 extra units of insulin instead of 5. From that a more
accurate reading would be better, but a whole lot of diabetics,
because of the inconvenience (and pain) of taking readings, only
take one or two readings a day, instead of the four that they
"should". For them, 4 85% accurate readings is a whole lot
better than 1 very accurate reading as is happening now.

Regards

JL
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext