THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 693.87

-0.2%

Jan 13 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (5283)	5/31/2007 6:58:33 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 25737

It's like saying that Dunkirk, Hitler allowing the British Expeditionary Force to escape back to sanctuary in England, 'was not significant to the outcome of WW II'. No it isn't even vaguely similar. Pakistan officially supported the Taliban. Then 9/11 happened. Officially they stopped, the actual aid persisted but was reduced, and in some cases Pakistan acted against the Taliban. They also gave us clearance to fly over Pakistan to wage war against the Taliban. The fact that some factions within Pakistan still support the Taliban, doesn't make Pakistan our enemy, or mean that we should treat the country as a whole as our enemy. Refusing to let Pakistanis out of Afghanistan would be treating Pakistan as our enemy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next