THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 694.04

+0.7%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (5610)	6/12/2007 6:06:34 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 25737

Yes its up to me to notice, and it was my mistake not yours. All I'm saying is that the parts in italics are going to be a quote from you, whether they are something you actually posted, or a weird mistake like what happened, it doesn't make sense to reply to them as if they where my point, if you know they are intended to be a quote from your post. I figured you didn't know that, so I'm informing you. The leading italicized text will always be a quote from the post I'm replying to (or in this weird case a misquote). My first point was "I think rather that it demonstrated the opposite. Two dominant parties is the norm." Then you replied "I don't get your first point". I'm just letting you know the italicized part of the post is never MY point, and that if a mistake like this ever happens again, it won't be my point either. Hopefully it won't. Its happened a couple of times before but that's out of over 36,000 posts, so you'll probably never have to deal with it. I apologize for the confusion.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next