SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JBTFD who wrote (100214)6/12/2007 9:48:19 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. "
en.wikipedia.org

Here. These are from YOUR side. Maybe they'll help you get the point.
deeperpolitics.gnn.tv
rense.com
topplerummy.org
prisonplanet.com

The term is actually centuries old. Back in The Goode Old Days when the Spaniards were stealing all the gold in the Western Hemisphere, the English (among others) wanted a cut. Since the Spaniards rudely refused to just hand it over, they resorted to piracy. That gold somehow had to be moved from the Western Hemisphere to Spain. The only available method was sailing ships. These ships flew flags to indicate their nationality. So: An English pirate hauls down the English flag, ups the Spanish flag, sails over to his prey who thinks a friendly ship is approaching to convoy with him- -and the English pirate opens fire.

THAT'S what a false flag operation is, dummy!

What's the dumbest breed of dog? I know its not a sheperd.

've already pointed out that the only way one could actually prove that an incident was a false flag operation would be if someone involved in perpetrating it CONFESSED. Even then diehard righties would just say that the person was a liar and would continue on with what they want to believe. The conclusion is that it is IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE A FALSE FLAG OPERATION in any way that would be acceptable to you.
DO WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN EVERYTHING TO YOU????
Somebody had to remark American planes and paint meatballs on them. Oh, and rebuild part of them since no American plane looked like the Japanese fighters and bombers used to attack Pearl Harbor (51 Mitsubishi A6M Type 0 fighters, 171 Nakajima B5N Type 97 torpedo bombers, and 108 Aichi D3A Type 99 dive bombers). Those planes had to be fueled, armed, and take off from somewhere. Then attack, land somewhere, and be repainted and partly rebuilt.

Oh. There was a Japanese 2-man midget submarine detected and sank by the USS Ward slightly prior to the attack. The US had none of those.

And you're going to do all of that, with all the people who would be involved and who would be PARTICULARLY ALARMED (by your own admission) after the Pearl Harbor attack, and no one would take any notes or pictures or talk to the press afterwards? And you expect us to believe this?
Because just ignoring warnings of an enemy attack (to the extent they existed, which has been endlessly argued in many books, and about some aspects of which there is conflicting testimony) IS NOT A FALSE FLAG OPERATION! Regardless of how many times you claim it is.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext