Disagree without Destroying Each Other
By Lorie Byrd on Republicans
Wizbang
Friday I linked to an Anchoress post about the tone of the recent debate on immigration. Today at the Examiner I discuss the need for the GOP to learn how to disagree without destroying each other.
There were powerful arguments to be made on the facts, and
some did just that. Unfortunately, though, some in the GOP
decided the way to succeed was to revert to the tactics
they have criticized those on the other side of the aisle
for engaging in for so many years. I wonder if they
realize how many supporters they risk alienating if they
continue down the road of trading accusations
like "traitor" and "bigot" in future debates.
I was drawn to the Republican Party as a teenager, and
have happily remained a Republican, in large measure due
to the tendency among its advocates to argue facts and
appeal to logic, rather than solely emotion.
In the case of the recent immigration debate, the public
desperately needed facts about the bill and its possible
ramifications. In addition to facts, emotion does play an
important role in political debate. Passion is what moves
the public to call and write their congressmen and to
venture out on a rainy day to vote. What too often passed
as passion and factual debate on this issue, however, were
attacks hurled from those on both sides of the issue.
Read the entire piece at The Examiner.
Mark Tapscott cites polls saying Congressional approval ratings are down for both parties and wonders whether a new party is needed
feeds.wizbangblog.com
wizbangblog.com
examiner.com
examiner.com