SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: briskit who wrote (208979)6/19/2007 11:16:28 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793957
 
Therefore, 60% of democrats have come to think it possible that Bush was involved in a conspiracy to attack our own country.

You've stretched that "therefore" well beyond reason. There is a range of positions that would evoke a "yes" answer to that question. Sure, some may think it was a deliberate plot by the administration. But you could also believe that the CIA had picked up some vague chatter about a possible attack somewhere, sometime, and answer yes to that question. And "undecided" is the most appropriate answer to any question to which you couldn't possibly have enough information for a well-founded belief, one way or the other.

A claim that 60% of Democrats think it possible that Bush was behind 9/11 is not supportable. There is a big difference between having heard something about an event before it happens and perpetrating that event.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News