SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (340449)6/19/2007 1:33:47 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1586476
 
He didn't get punished......he just couldn't advertise that covering vents keeps out rodents

He couldn't advertise that he's covering entrenches to try to keep out the rodents and other pests, which is exactly what he was doing. If you ever run a business I wonder if you'll still see a government edict against your being able to advertise what you do, as something other than a punishment.

Its misleading.

Its not misleading, it was the service that he was providing, and apparently with some effectiveness.

Now if he said covering your vents is one way to prevent rodents from entering your house, they probably would have allowed it.

No, they didn't go after him for breech of contract or false advertising. There is no evidence that he was guilty of either, but if he was that should have been the issue. Instead the issue raise was that he advertised that he was dealing with pests, and he doesn't have a pest control license. It wouldn't matter how effective his work was, or how accurate his ads where. Its a simple matter to this bureaucracy, no license, no claims about dealing with pests allowed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext