SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Picks of the quarter
ATHR 5.840-3.9%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sr K who wrote (3628)6/25/2007 11:39:29 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) of 20435
 
The cover of a short position is not 1% of the dwindled cash in that short position, but 1% cost on the stock price to close times the shares.

I think they're the same thing. For example, here's McMannis position:

Jim McMannus
Stock Price Shares Value Cost Change
TRMD $37.41 1.437 $53.75 $34.80 7%
KRC $70.57 0.672 $52.59 $74.43 -5% Short
Jim McMannus Total = $106.34

His short position in KRC has risen in value to $52.59 since his stock has fallen since he initiated the short. So if he covers, we give him $52.59 cash minus 1% of $52.59 (the commission).

The formula for the Value columns for short positions is

= (Initial Short Price + (Initial Short Price - Current Price))* # of shares.

In other words, since the Value column calculates the performance of the short position since initiation (it goes up if the stock goes down, and vice versa), when one covers a short they basically get the amount of the Value column minus the normal 1% trading commission. No?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext