Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (108204)	6/28/2007 11:33:05 AM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (1) of 132070

KT, I saw the tap out fight the same as you. The rules aren't clear to me though. I saw a Matt Hughes fight where he was choked into unconsciousness and dropped the opponent who was then knocked out by the fall and they gave it to Matt Hughes. The Jackson/Liddell result made perfect sense. I think that's a matchup issue. I'd be willing to bet that Liddell can beat a lot of guys that Jackson can't beat even though he can't beat Jackson. Liddell usually wins with intimidation and KO power. Jackson can take a punch, throw back with KO power, and is not intimidated at all. He gets Chuck moving backwards and puts him into a very cautious mode. That's not the way Chuck wants to fight. I can't see him beating Rampage because I don't think he can hurt him with a single punch unless it's landed perfectly. That's tough to do when you are going backwards or side to side and he's chasing you around the ring. A good wrestler/submission guy can take Rampage down and beat him. That's tougher to do against Chuck, whose defense against that kind of thing looks great.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next