SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (341597)6/28/2007 4:22:03 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1577930
 
Okay, now I believe they are hiding something substantive. Previously, I thought they were stonewalling for the sake of stonewalling but now it looks very much like they are hiding stuff.

********************************************************
Judiciary chairmen blast White House claim of executive privilege

Thursday , June 28, 2007 Posted: 11:46 AM
WHITE HOUSE (AP) - The chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees are blasting the White House over its latest move in the fired prosecutors controversy.

The White House Thursday asserted executive privilege in rejecting a congressional subpoena for documents related to the firing of federal prosecutors.

In a letter to the panels, White House counsel Fred Fielding also made clear that former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor would not testify next month.

Fielding said the White House would not reveal internal communications, calling it "a bedrock presidential prerogative."

Senator Patrick Leahy calls the move "Nixonian stonewalling." The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman also accuses President Bush of acting as if he's "above the law."

House Judiciary chairman John Conyers says the assertion of executive privilege was "unprecedented in its breadth and scope" and shows "an appalling disregard" for the people's right to know.

newschannel5.tv
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext