SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (210389)7/2/2007 1:09:46 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) of 793964
 
That concept sickens me. It's like setting out to make money off an outbreak of the Plague.

To quote someone here; apples and oranges. In the case of the plague you would be making money on someone's misery. In the case of alternate energy, you would be making money at the same time as making life better. What is miserable about global warming? Everyone now admits there is global warming so the only issue left to debate is whether or rather how much of that global warming is caused by man.

If investing in alternate energy sources that help decrease our dependence on wacky unstable countries - at the same time we target global warming, what is wrong with that? If creating new technology that produce less polluting energy sources also has as a side benefit cleaner air that doesn't cause so much allergies/asthma in children, what is wrong with that? Conservatives of all people should gladly and openly embrace business opportunities that make life better. Maybe the hate for Gore clouds the thinking?

steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News