Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (210666)	7/4/2007 2:59:03 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (2) of 793917

I have a question - does anyone think that the importance of the ME wrt energy can be seriously diminished in the future? Personally, I cannot see this happening. No matter how much oil we may be able to discover, the ME will still remain a large part of the global energy equation. As we use oil sands or coal - or even nuke energy - they will still have to compete with the ME. In other words, I think that a realistic view would be to accept the fact that - for the foreseeable future - there will be huge amounts of money continuing to flow into the hands of the rulers in the ME. A potentially more (politically) productive approach would be to continue thriving for stability in the region. Don't allow extremists to become the recipients of oil revenues.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next