Having been hit twice by drivers who ran red lights, I totally believe in filming traffic violators. In my cases, I didn't need film, as I had lots of witnesses who came forward to point the finger at the other guys. However, I think that's a rarity, as most people don't want to get involved with the police or the courts.
As far as security against terrorists, it sure has helped the English, eh? <G> It provides zero security. It does provide help in tracking down perps. But if someone is willing to commit a suicide bombing, I don't think they will be deterred by cameras. In fact, many will be encouraged to commit terrorist offenses as it would be "American Idol" for those who can't sing. That is, if "American Idol" were not already filming those who can't sing. <G> IF it did provide security, $8 million a month would be a drop in the bucket compared to the $13 billion a month we waste on Iraq, which could be hurting our security.
One problem I have is that the cameras would cause police and citizens alike to be less vigilant. BFD, the camera's got a picture, so why should I extend myself?
There will be huge problem solved. People would stop making out with police wives in public if they thought their actions were going to watched by handgun toting hubbies. <G> |
