SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : FOOD POLICE: What did you eat in the last 24 hours?
EAT 102.65+0.4%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (14)7/13/2007 12:16:34 AM
From: Stan  Read Replies (1) of 429
 
Thanks for the article, Iktomi. That is news to me. I remember an article years ago where a study showed that selenium was a factor in a lower incidence of certain kinds of cancer where it was more abundant in the soil and higher incidence of those same cancers where it was depleted (as in the coasts). I forget now which cancers were referred to. So, now this study shows a diabetes 2 connection for the same supplement. Plus, it says that selenium soil levels in the US are adequate, rebutting the statement in the study I read. So, which one do we laymen accept?

I remember a "rule" that says, "vitamins in the day and minerals and herbs at night," which is one reason I take selenium at night.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext