SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (108407)7/16/2007 1:18:50 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
>>If the risk of inaction means that there's a 1% of biological, chemical or nuclear weapons getting into the hands of someone that could kill 100s of thousands of Americans, that 1% is not acceptable. <<

if invading a sovereign nation under false pretenses increases (many fold, imho) the odds of biological, chemnical or nuclear weapons getting into the hands of someone that could kill 100s of thousands of Americans, that 1% starts to sound pretty darn good compared to 2, 3, 4 or 5%.

i have news for you - freedom means people are free to do harm to you. the only way that they wouldn't be free to do harm to you is to have a police state lock down like the world has never seen to date.

then the rulers of the police state would do harm to you.

safety is a ruse by folks who would like to remove your freedoms and liberties for their personal gain.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News