SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (108458)7/17/2007 11:57:34 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
Here are the age of consent laws by state if you are interested.

It's 17 in NY where I live, but they almost never prosecute at 16 if there was a lasting consensual relationship. In fact, that was one of the points of contention in the infamous Joey Buttafuco case. Amy was 16 and Joey was in his 30s when their affair started, but it was considered very unusual to prosecute because they had an ongoing consensual affair past 17. Make your own value judgement and do not assume to know mine.

actwin.com

For the record, when I used the term "confused", I was referring to "sexually confused" as in "am I gay, straight or bisexual" not confused as in "should I do this because he's an authority figure". I thought that should have been very clear from all my prior posts where I made the same point.

A legally consenting person can be sure he's homosexual or not sure he's a homosexual, but I doubt the law distinguishes between the two as long it was consensual. Why would the law care if he was "sexually" confused?

I don't know if there are any special applications of the law by age if the older person was a priest.

Here are some more stats:

religioustolerance.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext