judge denies 6 of the 14 motions....
docket No Made Motion Action Motion 473 Roche DENIED Summary Judgment That Claim 10 of the '933 Patent is Invalid on the Ground of Failure to Comply with Claim Differentiation Under Section 112 478 Roche DENIED Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of Patent No. 5,955,422 and Claims 9 and 12 of Patent No. 5,547,933 , 498 Amgen Summary Judgment of No Obviousness-Type Double Patenting 509 Amgen Summary Judgment of Infringement of '422 Claim 1, '933 Claim 3, and '698 Claim 6 , 490 Roche DENIED Summary Judgment That The Claims Of Patents-In-Suit Are Invalid For Double Patenting Over Amgen 016 Patent 518 Amgen Summary Judgment on Roche's Antitrust and State Law Conterclaims 482 Roche DENIED Summary Judgment That Claim 1 of the '422 Patent is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112 505 Roche DENIED Summary Judgment That the Asserted Claims of the '933 Patent are Invalid for Indefiniteness and Lack of Written Description 531 Amgen Summary Judgment That Dr. Lin's Asserted Claims are Definite, Adequately Described and Enabled 539 Roche Summary Judgment That Claim 7 of Patent No. 5,756,349 Is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112 and Is Not Infringed 544 Amgen DENIED Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct 620 Roche Summary Judgment that Amgen is Estopped from Asserting Infringment Under the Doctrine of Equivalents of the Asserted Claims of the '933 and '422 Patents , 624 Roche Summary Judgment that Amgen is Estopped from Asserting Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents of the Asserted Claims of the '698 and '868 Patents 614 Roche Summary Judgment That Claim 1 Of U.S. Patent No. 5,995,422 Is Invalid For Indefiniteness And Lack Of Written Description |