Big Dog's Boom Boom Room Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (87832)	7/21/2007 2:17:47 PM
From: ChanceIs	Read Replies (2) of 206305

>>>BP's plan to modernize and expand its Whiting Refinery runs into a buzzsaw of opposition.<<< About four months ago I sat in on the Senate Energy Committee hearing on high gasoline prices. In it, Sen Ron Wyden abused Paul Sankey (DeutscheBank) and accused the refinery community of intentionally not constructing additional refining capacity in order to keep the supply of gasoline down and prices up. Sankey must have used the phrase "legislative and environmental uncertainty" 20 times. I guess this proves that he was correct. Query for the board. The article reads: >>>They've hired a consultant to review the water permit granted by Indiana regulators that will allow BP, one of the largest polluters along the Great Lakes, to dump 54 percent more ammonia and 35 percent more sludge into Lake Michigan each day.<<< Isn't ammonia valuable for fertilizer?? Why would they dump that??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next