SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 227.90+2.0%3:52 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pgerassi who wrote (236916)7/23/2007 9:08:14 PM
From: wbmwRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Re: Here is a comparison between E4300 with G965/IGP versus BE2350 with 690G/IGP or X2 3800+ EE with 690G/IGP:

techreport.com

Notice how much lower 690G/IGP with either 2GHz X2 3800+ or 2.1GHz BE2350 than the 1.8GHz 2MB L2 1066MHz FSB E4300 with G965/IGP at both idle and under load.


Yes, AMD's new low power 45W TDP parts actually get 5W lower idle power and 4W lower Cinebench power than Intel's 65W TDP Allendale chip. You must be quite proud of them, especially considering that their low power 65nm parts with special low power chipset is hardly much better than the Intel chipset you claim is poor at power efficiency. Go figure.

But the question is, why bring this up in a mobile CPU discussion? Intel enables C4E Enhanced Deeper Sleep state on Merom, something that Turion doesn't even support (Turion supports up to C3, while Turion X2 only supports C1E). Intel also runs Merom at lower voltage than Turion (as low as 0.55V under C4E), something AMD is far from being able to match.

By the way, AMD has yet to release thermal specs for their Turion X2 processors. Why is that? Are they embarrassed about the specs...?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext