SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (236950)7/24/2007 11:47:07 AM
From: BUGGI-WORead Replies (4) of 275872
 
@TSMC - 45nm
It could and should be, that AMD will do an MCM package ->
One CPU Die (SOI) + one GPU Die (Bulk@TSMC) = 1 package.

-> the "problem" I have with that is the added feature for
the customer, which is near zero

-> why should a CPU+GPU (2 DIEs, 1 Package) be faster compared
to 1 CPU + 1 GPU Card with the same GPU die?

-> keep in mind the extra logistical tasks and possible errors
-> AMD has a working CPU, anyone places the GPU (working) on
the package and the whole thing is broken -> both broken
-> how do you allocate different CPU speeds with GPU? -> how
many xyz MHz CPUs? with how many zyx GPU Cores?
-> etc. pp.

In the end, the whole theme is way more difficult and brings
many EXTRA headaches which could go wrong and you end with ->
nothing extra for the customer.
Keep in mind, that such solution will ALWAYS be LOW-END, be-
cause if the CPU burns 65W as one example, with how much more
heat could the package work -> a reasonable simple guess
should be additional 60-70W, which would bring the "one package" in
the 120-130W range with 2 DIEs. What do you do, if the GPU
will change -> new layouts?

The whole Fusion concept in this environment doesn't look
very appealing to me.

BUGGI
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext