SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (21238)7/24/2007 4:15:31 PM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (2) of 71588
 
And they have found the former nuclear weapons program, described as a "grave and gathering danger" by President Bush and a "mortal threat" by Vice President Cheney, in much the same shattered state left by U.N. inspectors in the 1990s.

washingtonpost.com

"grave and gathering danger" and "mortal threat" sounds omininously imminent" And how can you say that Bush did the right thing when we ostensibly invaded Iraq because of its WMD threat to American. Why else did we invade Iraq? So how can it have been the right thing to do when it turns out their are no WMDs. On top of it all, it was Osama Bin Laden that attacked America, he is and always was the REAL imminent threat to America, yet we let him go. How come? Why did we exit Afghanistan when the job was not done and OBL not captured or killed. I mean, that is a huge mystery to me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext