SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 695.17+0.2%Jan 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: longnshort who wrote (6682)7/26/2007 6:31:24 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 25737
 
"so you want to invade Pakistan ?"

Any 'ungoverned area' in the world --- such as the 'Tribal region' of Pakistan, that is BEYOND the control or governance of the central Pakistani government --- is a potential magnet for Terrorist groups.

In this case, it is the administrative and operational heart of al Qaeda and the Taliban... though other extremists operate there as well.

So, yes. If the central government CANNOT take effective control of the area then, IMO, it has forfeited all rights to sovereignty there... and we would be perfectly within our national rights of self defense to take military action there. (Same as we took military action against the nation - Afghanistan - that was providing safe haven to terrorism previously, under the so-called 'Bush Doctrine'.)

I can also add that --- so long as Taliban and al Qaeda are allowed their safe haven in Pakistan... a place to resupply, retrain, recruit, totally safe from attack --- then the War in Afghanistan will *never* be won.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext