SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 253.72+1.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: graphicsguru who wrote (237742)7/30/2007 10:04:34 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Graphisguru:

Damages can be awarded dozens of years after the fact. Necessary given our slow legal system. Plus it doesn't matter where the CPUs are made, just where they were sold. Plenty of that here in the US.

Just try that argument that persons born in Russia can kill persoons born in China on US soil and they wouldn't be put into a US prison.

Besides, EU end customers were harmed by not having competition to drive down the costs and up the performance. Having to use hot slow P4s instead of cool fast K7s and K8s is a harm no matter where they were made.

Further, a single act later can make the entire period possible for damages. From a decision about a bid rigging case from 1977 to 1988 started in 1993, For statute of limitations purposes, a bid-rigging conspiracy continues "until either the final payments are received under the illegal contract or the final distribution of illicit profits among the co-conspirators occurs.

So if Intel injured AMD by paying out any cash after 2001, AMD can recover for the entire period of this ongoing antitrust suit. Plainly Intel was paying "marketing funds" much later than 2001.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext