But, Navin added, it is not necessarily permissible to kill someone just for pointing a gun at you.
ROE (Rules of Engagement)
Competent commanders, typically geographic combatant commanders, after JCS review and approval, issue ROE. ROE describe the circumstances and limitations under which forces will begin or continue to engage in combat. Normally, execution orders (EXORD), operations plans (OPLAN), and operations orders (OPORD) contain ROE. ROE ensure use of force in an operation occurs in accordance with national policy goals, mission requirements, and the rule of law. In general, ROE present a more detailed application of LOAC principles tailored to the political and military nature of a mission. ROE set forth the parameters of an airman’s right to self-defense. All airmen have a duty and a legal obligation to understand, remember, and apply mission ROE. During military operations, LOAC and specifically tailored ROE provide guidance on the use of force. The standing rules of engagement (SROE) of the CJCS give commanders direction on the use of force in self-defense against a hostile act or hostile intent. The SROE do not limit an airman’s inherent right to use all means necessary and appropriate for personal or unit self-defense. Some basic considerations based on the SROE follow:
The use of force in self-defense must be necessary and limited to the amount needed to eliminate the threat and control the situation.
Deadly force should only be used in response to a hostile act or a demonstration of hostile intent. Deadly force is defined as force that causes or has a substantial risk of causing death or serious bodily harm.
Failure to comply with ROE may be punishable under the UCMJ.
ROE questions and concerns should be promptly elevated up the chain of command for resolution.
Above information derived from AFPAM36-2241V1
Comment: Captain Navin may have been goosed to greatness a bit early.
Point a gun at an LAPD officer and you will be on the receiving end of about 8 or 9 rounds of 9mm. |
