SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (12461)7/31/2007 11:46:21 PM
From: Joe Sixer  Read Replies (1) of 224729
 
Giuliani wants to give you a tax break for health coverage,

He must be doing a little reading of Ron Paul’s web pages. He is stealing out of Ron’s playbook. The "odd Congressman has advocated this type of approach for years and no one will listen as there is too much money at stake.

Again it is understanding the root cause of the problem - just read:

Diagnosing our Health Care Woes
September 25, 2006

No one disputes the diagnosis: American health care is in lousy shape. As a practicing physician for more than 30 years, I find the pervasiveness of managed care very troubling.

The problems with our health care system are not the result of too little government intervention, but rather too much. Contrary to the claims of many advocates of increased government regulation of health care, rising costs and red tape do not represent market failure. Rather, they represent the failure of government policies that have destroyed the health care market.
It’s time to rethink the whole system of HMOs and managed care. This entire unnecessary level of corporatism rakes off profits and worsens the quality of care. But HMOs did not arise in the free market; they are creatures of government interference in health care dating to the 1970s. These non-market institutions have gained control over medical care through collusion between organized medicine, politicians, and drug companies, in an effort to move America toward “free” universal health care.

One big problem arises from the 1974 ERISA law, which grants tax benefits to employers for providing health care, while not allowing similar incentives for individuals. This results in the illogical coupling between employment and health insurance. As such, government removed the market incentive for health insurance companies to cater to the actual health-care consumer. As a greater amount of government and corporate money has been used to pay medical bills, costs have risen artificially out of the range of most individuals.

Only true competition assures that the consumer gets the best deal at the best price possible by putting pressure on the providers. Patients are better served by having options and choices, not new federal bureaucracies and limitations on legal remedies. Such choices and options will arrive only when we unravel the HMO web rooted in old laws, and change the tax code to allow individual Americans to fully deduct all healthcare costs from their taxes, as employers can.

As government bureaucracy continues to give preferences and protections to HMOs and trial lawyers, it will be the patients who lose, despite the glowing rhetoric from the special interests in Washington. Patients will pay ever rising prices and receive declining care while doctors continue to leave the profession in droves.

and as a bonus he would be the terrorists worst nightmare. Why not support him for 08 instead of a candidate who could never win?

Because as previously pointed out there is not a candidate one that is not beholding to those who put them in office. Guiliani is nothing but a sleazeball opportunist out to increase his personal wealth and power as are 95% of the politicians.

Finally, you don't know he can't win if you don't try. That is why you must be true to yourself and your beliefs. He is the only political candidate that I have ever financially supported, because he is closest to what I believe are the correct positions on the issues - not 100%, but head and shoulders above the rest of the riff raff that we have to choose from. I believe we must have change - for the sake of our children and grandchildren.

More on Ron's ideas on health care issues here:

ronpaullibrary.org

And here:

ronpaullibrary.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext