SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Murrey Walker who wrote (214219)8/2/2007 11:19:37 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793914
 
Why did you choose to dig deeper?

I don't understand your point.

I chose to dig deeper because 1) I'm a retired government analyst who is naturally curious about public policy and systems.

And 2) because I'm very hassle adverse. If I had to compute my own Part B payment, that could be an important negative in my determination of whether to choose it.

And 3) because I wondered whether I would be one of those who had to pay the premium. "Income" can mean many different things, things that would alter my premium. Not that the additional premium would be such a problem. It's more a question of whether and why Medicare somehow considers me rich enough to pay premiums and what that means for determining "means."

you inadvertently became part of the problem and overlooked the solution?

Which problem and solution do you have in mind? And what does "interpretive confusion" mean as it applies to this?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News